Your Livable Communities Newsletter
|
|
See the 3 articles below that address the following issues:
1. Economy: There is strong business case for racial equity that is independent of the human to human considerations that we all have felt. Would you believe that ensuring that people of color across the country have equitable wages will lead to an additional $1 trillion in earnings (a 15% gain), an additional $800 billion in spending, and an increase of $450 billion in federal taxes collected? Equity is great for business!
2. Equity: Individuals and families living in cars, tents, and other provisional housing cannot wait for help – they need it now. Recognizing that affordable housing cannot be built fast enough and looking to mobilize and inspire an integral segment of our community, the United Way of Ventura County launched a Landlord Engagement Program (LEP) as part of its initiative to end homelessness. The program aims to increase the rental housing available to those with housing vouchers and housing subsidies. By engaging landlords and offering participation incentives, the LEP is recruiting, cultivating, retaining, and growing the number of housing champions within our community.
3. Environment: If we can meet our sustainable groundwater needs while avoiding negative impacts to the environment, disadvantaged communities, cities, and small family farms, we should embrace balanced representation, or at the very least, be identifying transparent avenues for balanced stakeholder input. What is it worth to us to balance our groundwater needs, adapt to climate change, or take steps to reverse the trajectory for native species on the brink of extinction? How much should we be willing to pay as a society to reduce public health impacts on our most vulnerable communities and livelihoods by shifting to sustainable groundwater?
Thanks,
Stacy Roscoe
|
|
The Business Case for Racial Equity
SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments) Facts
by Stacy Roscoe
Top Curve: High Income (>$60,000) saw job losses of 13.0%
Center Curve: Middle Income ($27,000 – $60,000) saw losses of 22.4%
Bottom Curve: Low Income (<$27,000) saw losses of 35.1%
SCAG is composed of 191 cities, 6 counties, 19.1 million people, and 67% of California’s disadvantaged communities. All of this has created the 15th largest economy in the world with a $1.2 trillion Regional GDP. SCAG has been tasked with developing an Inclusive Economic Recovery Strategy (IERS). This article is a summary of some of the baseline data used in SCAG’s work that details the issues at hand for developing an inclusive economic recovery in Ventura County, California, and the rest of the country.
Status of the SCAG Economy:
Before the pandemic, SCAG median household income grew 7.1% in 2019 to $76,981 (faster than the national rate of growth).
As the graph above shows, lower-income SCAG residents saw higher employment loses between January 2020 and April 2020, and will likely see a slower recovery
Baseline Data – Ventura County
1. Even before the onset of the pandemic, Ventura County was experiencing a prolonged period of weakness.
2. The county’s labor force shrank in each of the last 7 consecutive years.
3. The county’s population shrank in 3 of the last 4 years, and net domestic migration has been negative since 2011.
4. Ventura County GDP growth declined in 4 of the last 5 years.
5. Job growth is dominated by low paying sectors while high paying sectors are in sustained decline. This divide is creating bi-model distribution of incomes in Ventura County.
6. Because the impacts of the pandemic are felt disproportionately among the economically vulnerable, SCAG expects pre-pandemic compositional changes to accelerate.
Baseline Data – Statewide
1. The income gap has grown faster in California than in the country as a whole.*
2. The richest Californians have seen record wealth gains this year.*
3. Those that already work paycheck to paycheck have been hit hardest.*
Baseline Data – Nationwide
1. Black and Hispanic workers faced 1.6 to 2.0 times the unemployment rates of white counterparts.**
2. Households with less than $30,000 in income faced double the unemployment rates.**
3. Women have accounted for 56% of workforce exits since the start of the pandemic, despite making up 48% of the workforce.**
4. The average earnings of persons of color in the US are 63% of the average earnings of whites of the same age and gender – roughly $25,000 per year versus $40,000.***
The Economic Impact of Closing the Gaps
1. Raising the average earnings of people of color to match those of whites by closing gaps in health, education, and opportunity would generate an additional $1 trillion in earnings, a 15% gain.***
2. Under current consumer spending patterns, $1 trillion in higher earnings would translate to an additional $800 billion in spending.***
3. Addressing racial inequalities by 2050 would result in an additional $2.6trillion in spending.***
4. Closing the earnings gap for people of color would increase federal tax revenues by $450 billion and state and local tax revenues by $100 billion annually.***
5. Between 1975 and 2018, if median income had grown at the same rate as GDP, median earners would make $92,000 per year versus the current median income of $50,000 per year.****
Developing an inclusive economic recovery is definitely good business and good economics!!!
SCAG will continue work to develop its strategy and will continue stakeholder reviews through the summer before its final report is published.
SOURCES:
* 2020 California Governor’s Budget Proposal
** McKinsey & Company, Achieving an Inclusive US Economic Recovery, Feb 3, 2021
*** The Business Case for Racial Equity, a Strategy for growth, by Ani Turner (Altarum) – WK Kellogg Foundation 2018
**** Trends in income from 1975 to 2018, Rand Education and Labor, Sept 2020
Keep your message brief, friendly, and to the point. If readers need to know more than you can fit here, add a link to an outside resource that covers the rest.
|
|
United Together We Can End Homelessness
by Amy Duganne, Director of Homelessness Initiatives, United Way of Ventura County
Creating opportunities for everyone in Ventura County means addressing the issues of housing stability and homelessness. Limited affordable housing supply, extremely low vacancy rates, and prohibitive and rising rents make home access for those with housing barriers exceedingly challenging. Homelessness and housing instability have only been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, with the crisis’s impact spanning the job market, rental market, and housing programs county-wide. Eviction moratoria are keeping households housed, but also force stagnation within our rental market, impeding would-be renters. As the gap between housing costs and incomes widens, the outcome is that more of our community become homeless.
The face of homelessness is diverse: young families with children, transitional age youth, seniors, veterans — all ages, genders, races, and ethnicities. Although each story is unique, all people experiencing homelessness share one thing — they do not have a safe nor appropriate place to live.
The simple, but not easy, solution
The solution to homelessness is straightforward: housing ends homelessness. Everyone needs a safe place to call home. When we connect individuals and families experiencing homelessness to housing and services, we provide the platform from which they can improve their quality of life, pursue goals, and thrive in the community. Prioritizing housing represents a belief that people need food and a place to live before they are able to find employment, budget properly, or confront substance use issues. Studies have shown that those who are housed are more likely to participate in job training, attend school, discontinue substance use, reduce instances of domestic violence, and spend fewer days hospitalized. Additionally, providing access to housing can directly result in cost savings for communities because housed people are less likely to utilize emergency services, including hospitals, emergency shelters, and jails.
Moral urgency and community impact
Individuals and families living in cars, tents, and other provisional housing cannot wait for help – they need it now. Recognizing that affordable housing cannot be built fast enough and looking to mobilize and inspire an integral segment of our community, the United Way of Ventura County launched a Landlord Engagement Program (LEP) as part of its initiative to end homelessness. The program aims to increase the rental housing available to those with housing vouchers and housing subsidies. By engaging landlords and offering participation incentives, the LEP is recruiting, cultivating, retaining, and growing the number of housing champions within our community. The LEP is achieving landlord participation by addressing their key needs and concerns:
· Responsive customer service
· Timely rental payments
· Assistance with inspection processes attached to housing voucher programs
· Liaising with the housing/homelessness system
· Mitigation of loss of income during move-in lag time
· Connecting tenants to supportive services and education in good tenancy
· Repair/damage mitigation, should the need arise
The LEP integrates with housing and homeless service programs county-wide, dedicating itself to housing search activities. Acknowledging the strained capacity of programs within the broader system, the LEP also provides supplemental tenant case management services to help meet the intensity of support often needed by those with housing vouchers trying to locate a rental, complete the application process, move in, and remain stably housed. This purposeful and action-oriented strategy is working. In sixteen months since the LEP’s inception, over fifty households have been housed throughout Ventura County.
Shifting the narrative
United together we can end homelessness in Ventura County. Public awareness is critical — educating, destigmatizing, and dispelling myths around what it means to be homeless and what is requisite to prevent and end homelessness. Advocacy is critical — driving public policy, engaging community and leadership in political advocacy, recommending solutions and activating resources. Compassion is critical — “It is hard to argue that housing is not a fundamental human need. Decent, affordable housing should be a basic right for everybody in this country. The reason is simple: without stable shelter, everything else falls apart.” (Matthew Desmond, Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City)
|
|
SGMA and Aquifer Sustainability
Locally Driven Groundwater Sustainability Agencies Require Balanced Representation
To Ensure All Stakeholder Interests Are Adequately Considered in SGMA
By Candice Meneghin
|
|
Since the inception of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) in 2014, 265 Groundwater Sustainability Agencies (GSA) have formed across the state, with the goal of bringing California’s groundwater basins into sustainability. GSAs are tasked to develop Groundwater Sustainability Plans (GSP) that will stop overdraft and balance the levels of recharge and pumping in medium and high priority groundwater basins by 2020 and 2022 respectively. These GSPs will provide a roadmap to groundwater sustainability within 20 years of implementation. The Department of Water Resources is supporting local management of these stakeholder driven processes, with GSAs empowered by SGMA regulations, but just how engaged and heard are the respective local stakeholders?
|
|
The Groundwater Resources Association of California hosted the first annual Western Groundwater Congress in Sacramento in 2018. The Congress was followed by the Non-Governmental Organizations Groundwater Collaborative’s annual Groundwater Convening. The NGO Groundwater Collaborative is a group of non-governmental organizations, tribes and individuals that share information and resources to aid NGO participation in the development and implementation of groundwater sustainability plans around the state. A common concern at both forums was one of representative stakeholder engagement – particularly for disadvantaged communities, small family farmers, and environmental interests. Ventura County is in a unique position whereby our County Board of Supervisors passed a resolution that authorized environmental representatives on new GSA boards.
Groundwater Sustainability Plans need to address the following undesirable results: surface water depletion, reduction of storage, degraded water quality, seawater intrusion, land subsidence, and lowering of groundwater levels. The GSAs will do this by setting minimum thresholds and measurable objectives, to guide management and project selection. Ultimately, these parameters will outline how the GSAs will consider and/or offset impacts to beneficial uses and users, while sustainably managing groundwater. These users and uses range from agriculture, municipalities, and industrial uses to the environment, disadvantaged communities, recreational users, and native American tribes.
|
|
The Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency was established by legislation prior to SGMA and has included The Nature Conservancy as an environmental representative on its advisory committee. In 2020 the Fox Canyon GMA Stakeholder Committee was convened by the Consensus Building Institute with funding from Department of Water Resources. The Fox Canyon facilitated process is an independent effort to facilitate consensus building among a broad range of stakeholders and interested parties (water agencies, cities, farmers, environment) on water resources management related to implementing SGMA. Stakeholders explore and discuss a range of issues, draw upon the best available science, consider and integrate to the extent possible all points of view and public input, and strive for consensus recommendations. The Hallmark Group took over facilitation in 2021 and the stakeholder group recently drafted a report of recommendations to the Fox Canyon GMA board for consideration.
The Fillmore and Piru Basins GSA has representatives from the County of Ventura, City of Fillmore (a disadvantaged community whose sole water supply is dependent on groundwater), United Water Conservation District, Fillmore Pumpers Association, Piru Pumpers Association, and the Santa Clara River Environmental Groundwater Committee. However, this balanced stakeholder representation is not being echoed across the state. It begs the question as to whether stakeholder engagement or lack thereof is indeed truly representing the local authority over the SGMA, as many planning processes are already underway. In other parts of California, the sole member of the GSA is a local water district, or in other cases stakeholders are participating in GSA meetings, but their feedback is not being adequately captured or considered by these non-representative GSAs.
Environmental stakeholders are well informed on the environmental regulations that the GSAs will have to comply with. While SGMA regulations are driving this process, GSAs are public agencies and still subject to compliance with a host of other environmental regulations, such as CEQA, Public Trust Doctrine, the Federal Endangered Species Act, Fish and Game Code, Clean Water Act, etc. Environmental stakeholders in Ventura County have had a host of successful and existing litigation that is tied to surface water, clean water, groundwater and GDE related concerns. It will be imperative that GSAs adequately outline their environmental regulation requirements, and environmental stakeholders can be key collaborators supportive of this process. Similarly, DACs, environmental justice groups, and small family farmers can best represent their interests and concerns by engaging in these processes.
If we can meet our sustainable groundwater needs while avoiding negative impacts to the environment, disadvantaged communities, cities, and small family farms, we should embrace balanced representation, or at the very least, be identifying transparent avenues for balanced stakeholder input. What is it worth to us to balance our groundwater needs, adapt to climate change, or take steps to reverse the trajectory for native species on the brink of extinction? How much should we be willing to pay as a society to reduce public health impacts on our most vulnerable communities and livelihoods by shifting to sustainable groundwater? Ventura County has the formula for success. The issues are complex, balancing competing needs can seem disparate, but if anything, sustainable groundwater management is a common goal. We just need to listen to one another to find consensus on how to reach that goal.
Candice Meneghin is a Board Member for watershed advocacy organization Friends of the Santa Clara River. Friends of the Santa Clara River is a member of the Santa Clara River Steelhead Coalition, Santa Clara River Environmental Groundwater Committee, and the California Non-Governmental Organizations Groundwater Collaborative and represent environmental stakeholder interests on the Fillmore and Piru Basins Groundwater Sustainability Agency, Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency and Mound Basin respectively.
|
|
Thank you for your Support!!
|
|
|
2019 State of the Region Report
|
A Special Thank You Goes to Our State of the Region Report Sponsors:
Research Sponsor –
Ventura County Community Foundation
Presenting Sponsor –
Ventura County Community College District
Domain Sponsors –
AERA
AT&T
California Lutheran University – Center for Economics of Social Issues
California State University Channel Islands
County of Ventura
Haas Automation Inc.
Limoneira
Montecito Bank & Trust
Supporting Sponsors –
Gold Coast Transit
The Port of Hueneme
United Staffing Associates
Ventura County Coastal Association of Realtors
VCDSA – Ventura County Deputy Sheriff’s Association
Ventura County Office of Education
Ventura County P-20 Council
Contributing Sponsors –
California Lutheran University Center for Nonprofit Leadership
SESPE Consulting Inc.
Ventura County Credit Union
Ventura County Transportation Commission
Friend Sponsors –
Dyer Sheehan Group, Inc.
David Maron
Ferguson Case Orr Paterson LLP
Kate McLean
Slover Memorial Fund
Stacy and Kerry Roscoe
Terri & Mark Lisigor
United Way of Ventura County
Media Sponsor –
Pacific Coast Business Times
Place article copy here. Be sure to make the articles short and concise as people tend not to read much more than a couple of paragraphs. Place article copy here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|